How did the first contemporary issue effect your principles? Did it challenge them? Were your principles helpful in working out your response to the issue? Which philosopher's position was most consistent with your own principles and why?
The first contemporary issue was abortion.I think that people should have their right to choose because that it is their life. But when a woman is pregnant and decides to get abortion. If she wants to get an abortion, I have complete understanding with that if she has reasons why she doesn't want to have the child. And if she does it in a time where that the fetus isn't completely formed, then I believe that the woman has that choice to have an abortion. But if a woman doesn't want the child but she's already 5 months pregnant, the fetus is already formed quite a lot. I think that she should have the baby but if she doesn't want the child, she should set it up towards adoption. This issue didn't really affect my principles because I believe that everyone has a choice and to make a right choice but to also justify whether or not it is the right choice. So I think warren's principles is most consistent with mine.
No comments:
Post a Comment